WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "b57e2bab-d3b1-42cc-a4e6-d99e39dbe932"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 3, "id": "344", "owners": [3], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "344"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:tuis.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000344", "sets": ["104"]}, "author_link": ["1387", "1388", "1389"], "control_number": "344", "item_1701328008552": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "東京情報大学", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_1_biblio_info_14": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2006-02-20", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "61", "bibliographicPageStart": "53", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "9", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "東京情報大学研究論集", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_1_creator_6": {"attribute_name": "著者名(日)", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "岩野, 秀明", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}, {"creatorName": "イワノ, ヒデアキ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "1387", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Iwano, Hideaki", "creatorNameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_1_creator_7": {"attribute_name": "著者名よみ", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "1388", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_1_creator_8": {"attribute_name": "著者名(英)", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "1389", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_1_description_1": {"attribute_name": "ページ属性", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "P(論文)", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_description_11": {"attribute_name": "抄録(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "この論文では、筆者は、真理論の部分とdoxa-論の部分を決定的に分離する解釈には賛成しない。我々の仮定は、パルメニデスはそのeonの概念を現象的世界の原理にまで発展させた、そしてそのための方法が「根源的多義性の方法」と我々が名づけるものであった、ということである。Eon(存在)の概念は二様に理解される、一方はマテリアリスティッシュな理解で宇宙と取り、他方はイデア論的にプラトン的イデアと取る。我々は両方を融合する統一的な道を取る。Eonは、真理、理念的宇宙、光(または火)という異なる意味を内包している。この概念的融合に、我々はパルメニデスの哲学的方法の可能性として、根源的多義性というものを見る。また彼の、思考と存在の一致、と、精神と要素の一致、のアナロジーは、根底からこの根源的多義性を支えている。このようにしてパルメニデスのeon(存在)が宇宙論的・宇宙創生論的内容に移行する、ことをこの論文は明らかにしようとするものである。", "subitem_description_language": "ja", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_description_12": {"attribute_name": "抄録(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In this treatise I don\u0027t agree to such an interpretation which supposes the decisive separation between the part of Truth and that of Doxa. We suppose that Parmenides developed the concept Eon into the principle of the phenomenal world and that his method for developping was that of original Equivocality. The concept Eon was in two ways conceived by interpreters , first in a materialistic manner as the cosmos,secondly in an idealistic manner as platonic idea. We search for an unified conception which integrates both the interpretations. We find a phase of transition of the concept Eon to the cosmological meaning in the sphere form of Eon and its boundary. (So we stand against the platonic understanding about the sphere form of Eon in the dialogue Sophistes.) The concept Eon comprehends different layers of meaning in itself together - Truth,An idealistic cosmos and Light(or Fire). This concept-fusion means , I think, an original Equivocality as a possible method of Parmenides\u0027 philosophy, and Parmenides\u0027 analogy between the identity of Thinking-Being and that of Noos-(cosmological)Elements maintains fundamentally this Equivocality. - In such a way Parmenides\u0027 concept Eon shifts its phase of meaning from aoriginal content to a cosmological and cosmogonical one and that the meaning shift was made from the point of view of the philosopher himself, but not from that of the goddess.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.15029/00000343", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_1_source_id_13": {"attribute_name": "雑誌書誌ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA11155514", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_1_text_10": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "en", "subitem_text_value": "Tokyo University of Information Sciences,Faculty of Informatics,Liberal Arts and Teacher\u0027s Education Course"}]}, "item_1_text_9": {"attribute_name": "著者所属(日)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_language": "ja", "subitem_text_value": "東京情報大学総合情報学部教養・教職課程"}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2006-02-20"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "KJ00003985315.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "482.4 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensefree": "TUIS", "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 482400.0, "url": {"label": "KJ00003985315", "url": "https://tuis.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/344/files/KJ00003985315.pdf"}, "version_id": "63aef0cd-e1ce-4a9c-80a7-3ee3eb8d9e36"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "パルメニデス", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "存在論", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "現象", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "多義性", "subitem_subject_language": "ja", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Parmenides", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "ontology", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "phenomenon", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "equivoqueness", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "パルメニデス 存在論から宇宙論へ", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "パルメニデス 存在論から宇宙論へ", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_title": "Parmenides -From Ontology to Cosmology-", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "1", "owner": "3", "path": ["104"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.15029/00000343", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2006-02-20"}, "publish_date": "2006-02-20", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "344", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["パルメニデス 存在論から宇宙論へ"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
パルメニデス 存在論から宇宙論へ
https://doi.org/10.15029/00000343
https://doi.org/10.15029/0000034367889680-7452-410f-ad2c-ba5ad7d40370
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00003985315 (482.4 kB)
|
TUIS
|
Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2006-02-20 | |||||||
タイトル | ||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||
タイトル | パルメニデス 存在論から宇宙論へ | |||||||
タイトル | ||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
タイトル | Parmenides -From Ontology to Cosmology- | |||||||
言語 | ||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||
キーワード | ||||||||
主題 | パルメニデス, 存在論, 現象, 多義性 Parmenides, ontology, phenomenon, equivoqueness |
|||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
ID登録 | ||||||||
ID登録 | 10.15029/00000343 | |||||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||
ページ属性 | ||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||||
著者名(日) |
岩野, 秀明
× 岩野, 秀明× Iwano, Hideaki
|
|||||||
著者所属(日) | ||||||||
ja | ||||||||
東京情報大学総合情報学部教養・教職課程 | ||||||||
著者所属(英) | ||||||||
en | ||||||||
Tokyo University of Information Sciences,Faculty of Informatics,Liberal Arts and Teacher's Education Course | ||||||||
抄録(日) | ||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
内容記述 | この論文では、筆者は、真理論の部分とdoxa-論の部分を決定的に分離する解釈には賛成しない。我々の仮定は、パルメニデスはそのeonの概念を現象的世界の原理にまで発展させた、そしてそのための方法が「根源的多義性の方法」と我々が名づけるものであった、ということである。Eon(存在)の概念は二様に理解される、一方はマテリアリスティッシュな理解で宇宙と取り、他方はイデア論的にプラトン的イデアと取る。我々は両方を融合する統一的な道を取る。Eonは、真理、理念的宇宙、光(または火)という異なる意味を内包している。この概念的融合に、我々はパルメニデスの哲学的方法の可能性として、根源的多義性というものを見る。また彼の、思考と存在の一致、と、精神と要素の一致、のアナロジーは、根底からこの根源的多義性を支えている。このようにしてパルメニデスのeon(存在)が宇宙論的・宇宙創生論的内容に移行する、ことをこの論文は明らかにしようとするものである。 | |||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||
抄録(英) | ||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
内容記述 | In this treatise I don't agree to such an interpretation which supposes the decisive separation between the part of Truth and that of Doxa. We suppose that Parmenides developed the concept Eon into the principle of the phenomenal world and that his method for developping was that of original Equivocality. The concept Eon was in two ways conceived by interpreters , first in a materialistic manner as the cosmos,secondly in an idealistic manner as platonic idea. We search for an unified conception which integrates both the interpretations. We find a phase of transition of the concept Eon to the cosmological meaning in the sphere form of Eon and its boundary. (So we stand against the platonic understanding about the sphere form of Eon in the dialogue Sophistes.) The concept Eon comprehends different layers of meaning in itself together - Truth,An idealistic cosmos and Light(or Fire). This concept-fusion means , I think, an original Equivocality as a possible method of Parmenides' philosophy, and Parmenides' analogy between the identity of Thinking-Being and that of Noos-(cosmological)Elements maintains fundamentally this Equivocality. - In such a way Parmenides' concept Eon shifts its phase of meaning from aoriginal content to a cosmological and cosmogonical one and that the meaning shift was made from the point of view of the philosopher himself, but not from that of the goddess. | |||||||
言語 | en | |||||||
雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
収録物識別子 | AA11155514 | |||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 東京情報大学研究論集 巻 9, 号 2, p. 53-61, 発行日 2006-02-20 |
|||||||
出版者 | ||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||
出版者 | 東京情報大学 |